This Judge Is Whacked
I'm listening to the Rossi trial decision. This judge needs to learn some basic logic before he renders his decisions. Here is an example of his fallacious logic (not a direct quote): "The only evidence we have of the real intent of the illegal voters were those who voted for Rossi or Bennet. Yet the petitioner's proportional deduction standard would have attributed their votes in part to Gregoire." Umm, yeah. It also partially attributed their votes to Bennett and Rossi. By this judge's logic, if I can find *any* single ballot that goes against the majority, it proves you can't trust the statistics. A single data point can disprove the overall data. Dumbass.
Update: The judge also made the brilliant decision to remove the illegal votes from the total count. However, he didn't change the votes for Rossi, Gregoire, or Bennet. So now we have an election where Total Votes < Rossi + Gregoire + Bennett. What a fitting ending.