« February 2005 | Main | April 2005 »

March 31, 2005

Berger Plea Ignores Victims

Tomorrow, Friday 1 April, 2005, Sandra Sandy Berger is expected to plead guilty to misdemeanor charges of removing classified documents from the National Archives. This plea arrangement is a travesty of justice.

How are the librarians at the NA supposed to cope with the grief and anguish of having to "restore" the valuable documents which were spirited out of the building in Berger's pants?

Justice has not been served and this blog will not rest until the librarians receive adequate counseling for their trauma. Or until "CSI" comes on.

March 29, 2005

Rather Vindicated!

After all the RatherGatetm (or, if you prefer, MemoGatetm) mess, it turns out Dan Rather was correct after all. Here is definitive proof. Time for apologies all around.

March 22, 2005

Rovian Incredibles

The BlogFather saw The Incredibles and wasn't off-put by the Rove-powered Direct-Brain Inductiontm.

Glenn, perhaps the reason you didn’t find the individualist philosophy in The Incredibles pronouced is because you aren’t terrified by the concept? Maybe you've spent too much time around these sorts of people?

March 21, 2005

Of Course, Rescuing Always Works

The WSJ ran an article by Jeff Opdyke today explaining why some people shouldn't have control over their own finances: they might make bad choices! No, really! Turns out not everybody is a financial expert. Mr. Opdyke complains that his own mother is a fiscal wimp:

Allowing her to manage her account would be tantamount to encouraging her to serve as her own lawyer or dentist. She simply doesn't have the skill set. But she also may not be able to resist.
How did the government let this happen? Clearly what is needed is not private SS accounts but financial re-education camps for young and old. We can't let people walk the streets if they don't know the difference between a P&L and balance sheet. For God's sake, what if they make a mistake!

I am worried -- and, frankly, not just for her. Family members like me ultimately bear the brunt if our parents make a hash of their investments.
And we don't want to have to live with our parents mistakes. Bad enough we have siblings, now we might have to take in old people who claim to be related, just because they took decisions as if they were adults. Who do these people think they are?
But here's the point: My mom had money, and she found the expenses to match the money. Like so many people, my mother doesn't really understand money or the importance of saving for tomorrow. And, like so many people, the knowledge that there's a big unspent slug of money in your name is just too tempting to overlook when there are expenses you have in mind.
Some people spend everything that comes through their hands. This is news? Some parents spend all their money on ungrateful offspring, in a sometimes-futile attempt to make a better life for their children, instead of squirreling it away for a Caribbean cruise after retirement. Some blow it on themselves and deny anything to their kids.

Mr. Opdyke wants you and me to take care of his mother because she's a spendthrift and he doesn't want to pay for her crap as she gets older. Sorry, but I have my own struggling progenitors to deal with. I don't want his, or yours.

The problem with Social Security is that people expect it, and they expect it to absolve them from responsibility for themselves and their families. Used to be a time (only very old people will remember it -- I don't) when you took care of yourself because nobody else would. Too bad we've taught generations that they don't have to worry about the future. We will tax the hell out of people in order to save you from your own bad choices.

Parents who rear their brats absent of consequences discover quickly that their snot-nosed hellions run the roost. Now, the diaper-clad toddlers are retirees screaming for dessert after tossing their peas on the floor. How are they going to learn about consequences at this age? It may be too late.

March 20, 2005

Damn you, LifeHacker!

There I was minding my own business, running through the latest updates from the Good Blogs when LifeHacker throws me down the long and painful stairs of addiction. I had lived a good life to this point devoid of any knowledge of the fabled Moleskina notebook. Decades of self-control gone in the flash of a pixel.

Before I knew what I was doing, I had discovered moleskinerie where I learned of the right pens to use. Mike's review saved me the error of overspending for a good instrument (still resisting the fountain pen obsession).

Then it was on to finding notebooks. I couldn't stop myself. What was this power gripping me? I'd never experienced the like of it before. Two bookstores later, there they were, the little black notebooks with the bright-colored bands. Thank goodness for that bit of marketing acumen, otherwise how would I, a mere novice, distinguish these distinguished books from the sea of imitators on the shelves?

I picked up two pocket notebooks but they only had one large notebook. Had to have two each, so I could pull Writer into my increasingly rapid downward spiral. The next day, we found the notebook at Barnes & Noble, bought a dozen Pilot G2s and a couple Pilot Dr. Grip Gel pens. There was no stopping until this was done.

Now, Writer and I have assigned the pockets to a special project. Eldest Daughter will be wed in September and we are using the notebooks to write special messages to her. We keep these thoughts private from each other. On the Blessed Day we will present the notebooks to her filled with our experiences, thoughts, hopes, memories and best wishes.

Damn you, LifeHacker for adding these books to our lives. And thank you.

March 18, 2005

Female Police

From the enimitable Ann Coulter

It turns out that, far from "de-escalating force" through their superior listening skills, female law enforcement officers vastly are more likely to shoot civilians than their male counterparts. (Especially when perps won't reveal where they bought a particularly darling pair of shoes.)

Unable to use intermediate force, like a bop on the nose, female officers quickly go to fatal force. According to Lott's analysis, each 1 percent increase in the number of white female officers in a police force increases the number of shootings of civilians by 2.7 percent.


March 17, 2005

Hillary On Parade

From Mark Steyn:

For the First Lady, New York has become a kind of Panderer’s Box: the minute you open it all kinds of competing identity groups fly out demanding you kiss up to them and you can never get the lid back on again. The only parade she should he marching in is the one for Tone-Deaf-Irish-Americans: not for the first time, she’s demonstrated her amazing tin ear for electoral politics.
Steyn per usual. Read. It. All.

March 13, 2005

Low, low prices

Wal-Mart is such an incredible discounter they even mark down their own stock:  Wal-Mart stock is off 23 percent

 

March 04, 2005

Esse Quam Videre

More unhappiness with the academic saboteurs at The Democracy Project.

I like the motto a great deal -- maybe I'll put that on the bloghead?

CMS

Tri-Geek Dreams has turned a clever phrase:  Common Man Syndrome.  I like it.  Much better than Creeping Mediocrity or Life-Sucking Routine.

 

I hereby make my pledge to fight CMS in myself and in those I care about.  The rest are on their own.

 

“Be bold and mighty forces will come to your aid.”

Goethe

CU in the Crosshairs

Excellent article by RMN’s Mike Rosen covering the ongoing battle at University of Colorado. 

 

Richard Rorty is a philosophy professor at the University of Virginia. He's also editor of an unabashedly socialist magazine, Dissent, and a hero of the academic left. Here's his political assessment of academe: "The power base of the Left in America is now in the universities, since the trade unions have largely been killed off. The universities have done a lot of good work by setting up, for example, African-American studies programs, Women's Studies programs, and Gay and Lesbian Studies programs. They have created power bases for these movements."

 

Hey, Mike, the movements have spread far beyond the university level.  The entire re-education system is infested with this kind of thinking.  In the 1970’s these programs were a joke but the Left kept after it.  In the 1980’s they combined with PC language police to stifle opposing voices and began the trickle-down into K-12.

 

As with politics, the blogosphere is giving voice to the silent generations of years past.

 

(via BlogFather)

March 01, 2005

Squint

I don’t always agree with Mr. Simon (often, but not always) but I like his take on Clint Eastwood after last night’s Oscars:

Has Clint just gotten started? His mother's 96. What genes. This victory for this incredible man has one simple message: never think about retiring.

The amazing thing about Million Dollar Baby is that it was made in 37 days. Some people wouldn't make the movie if offered only that much time.

Big Winner tonight: Clint Eastwood. Big loser: Chris Rock.

Saw Million Dollar Baby Friday night.  Go see it – it’s not what you think.  Swank was absolutely terrific and any chance I get to see Morgan Freeman, I do it.  Can Eastwood get any better?  I don’t know but he sure seems to.